Sunday, April 5, 2015

Murphy's Law applies, universally

The Encyclopedia of Cleveland History:
The EAST OHIO GAS CO. EXPLOSION AND FIRE took place on Friday, 20 Oct. 1944, when a tank containing liquid natural gas equivalent to 90 million cubic feet exploded, setting off the most disastrous fire in Cleveland's history. Homes and businesses were engulfed by a tidal wave of fire in more than 1 sq. mi. of Cleveland's east side, bounded by St. Clair Ave. NE, E. 55th St., E. 67th St., and the Memorial Shoreway.

At approx. 2:30 P.M., white vapor began leaking out of Storage Tank No. 4, which had been built by the East Ohio Gas Co. in 1942 to provide additional reserve gas for local war industries. The gas in the tank, located at the northern end of E. 61st St., became combustible when mixed with air and exploded at 2:40 P.M., followed by the explosion of a second tank about 20 minutes later. The fire spread through 20 blocks, engulfing rows of houses while missing others.

The vaporizing gas also flowed along the curbs and gutters and into catch basins, through which it entered the underground sewers, exploding from time to time, ripping up pavement, damaging underground utility installations, and blowing out manhole covers. The immediate area surrounding the burning district was evacuated and refugees were sheltered in Willson Jr. High School on E. 55th St. where the Red Cross tried to care for approx. 680 homeless victims.

By late afternoon Saturday much of the fire had burned itself out, electricity was restored in some areas, and the next day a few residents began returning to their homes. The fire destroyed 79 homes, 2 factories, 217 cars, 7 trailers, and 1 tractor; the death toll reached 130.




Here's why the Council of Canadians is calling for a stop to the Woodfibre LNG project:
  • It is one of 18 proposals to build LNG terminals along the Pacific Coast and could set a dangerous precedent if approved.
  • As noted by retired KPMG consultant Eoin Finn LNG tankers are categorized under Class 2 under the Maritime Dangerous Good Code for Shipping (1 being most dangerous, 9 being least dangerous). LNG tankers are massive vessels at 300 metres long (the equivalent to three football fields), 40 metres wide and 30 metres tall, are twice as big in width and height as a B.C. ferry and pose a unique threat to coastal communities if there were to ever be an explosion or accident.
  • The Squamish Woodfibre LNG plant will be cooled by sea-water from Howe Sound and every hour will discharge 17,000 tonnes of water -- enough to fill seven Olympic-sized swimming pools -- back into the Sound at 10 degrees above that of the intake. Hypochlorite will be added to the discharge to reduce growth of marine fouling organisms such as mollusks and oysters. This mixture will be discharged into Howe Sound 24 hours per day year round. We are concerned about how this will impact the marine ecosystem of Howe Sound.
  • The gas needed for even just five LNG terminals would increase fracking in the province, have significant impact on the lakes, rivers and streams in B.C. and would more than double B.C.'s current climate footprint.

Recommend this post

4 comments:

  1. So, help me with the thermodynamics here. Seven Olympic size swimming pools per hour or over 400,000 tonnes per day. At 10 degrees (C?) above that of the intake. Would that be the equivalent of 40,000 tonnes at 100 degrees above intake temperature? Seems that with a heat exchanger that would heat a lot of Squamish homes.
    Makes you wonder how many homes the gas, which we are giving away for nothing, would heat.
    Makes little sense to compress this stuff, endanger the population, then give it away on expensive boats when many locals would, and likely do, PAY for it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Woodfibre LNG would be powered by BC Hydro.

    So would BC Hydro lose $$ on the project, since new power acquired by BC Hydro appears to be more expensive than what it would sell the power for?

    Also the insanity of using clean renewable power from BC Hydro to produce CO2-emitting LNG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...the insanity of using clean renewable power from BC Hydro to produce CO2-emitting LNG." Only our government could come up with, never mind promote, an idea like this.
      I don't know if anyone knows what BC Hydro would charge. I understand the rate for Ajax Mine (Kamloops) was to be 3 cents / kwh. Meanwhile I (a pensioned taxpayer) pays 11.27 cents / kwh! Of course, I don't contribute to the Liberal's election fund. Well, not directly!

      Delete
  3. none of the facts will stop this plant, as long as the b.c. liberals and their corporate masters want it there. remember this is a government who is still clawing back, until sept the child support children receive, when the child is living at 50% below the poverty line. Does any one really think christy clark and her cabal really care if that plant blows up? How they rationalize it is beyond me, but even if you put this article on the desk of every b.c. liberal mla, they would still vote to proceed. they just don't care, its about the money. if this proposed plant blows up, killing hundreds of people you can bet your next pension cheque they will have another one built.

    This is a government which has decided to not proceed with bringing B.C. schools up to earth quake standards until 2030. this was to be done by 2020, now they say they don't have the money. so here we are in an earthquake zone and the b.c. lieberals are taking the chance that thousands upon thousands of children could be killed if we had an earthquake. some of these schools can't even withstand an moderate earthquake, so a plant perhaps blowing up, not on their radar.

    ReplyDelete

COMMENTING

This is an archive only of items published before April 22, 2016. These and newer articles are available at:

https://in-sights.ca/

If you read an article at this blogger site, you can comment on it at the new site.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.