Sunday, July 27, 2014

Socialized losses, privatized gains

Every megaproject conceived and executed by BC Liberals in recent years has ended with massive cost overruns, despite the predictable "on-time and on-budget" claims. Most involved contractors with foreign domiciles. Check out the Port Mann bridge project, South Fraser Perimeter Road, BC Place renovation, Vancouver Convention Centre, Sea to Sky Highway, Northwest Transmission Line, etc.

Remember claims reported by Canadian Press in February 2013,
"Premier Christy Clark's Liberal government says the development of liquefied natural gas in northern British Columbia represents a generational opportunity that has the potential to wipe out the provincial debt and eliminate the need to pay sales taxes.

"The government's throne speech delivered Tuesday -- less than three months before the start of an election campaign -- said LNG export possibilities represent a possible $1 trillion boost to B.C.'s gross domestic product over the next 30 years.

"Clark announced in the throne speech a new B.C. Prosperity Fund that could accumulate between $100 billion and $260 billion in revenues from LNG royalties and business taxes, enough to wipe out the province's current debt of $56 billion by 2028..."
Since the government's Budget and Fiscal Plan 2014/15 - 2016/17 predicts natural gas royalties about equivalent to unrecorded liabilities now owed producers, Premier Photo Op's promise of wiping out provincial debt by 2028 depends on net royalties earned in fiscal years after 2017. Since Government projects provincial debt will grow to $69 billion by 2017, that will require a contribution of $6.3 billion a year from net natural gas royalties, which is about $6.2 billion more than BC has been averaging recently.

To accumulate revenues between $100 billion and $260 billion by 2043, the last half of Clark's 30 year vision will have to produce between $3B and $17B annually. Anyone out there believe Clark's government is serious about their numbers? Were they serious when they spoke of those dreams? Of course not.

However, what they are serious about is moving into private hands billions of dollars worth of public assets, with portions drifting into the hands of friendly insiders. That means, at least,
  • larger subsidies of gas exploration and production costs,
  • further royalty reductions and waivers,
  • payment by the public for transmission and transportation infrastructure,
  • below-cost energy for LNG liquefaction facilities,
  • relief from environmental regulations involving hazardous wastes and fossil fuel production, and
  • alteration of income tax rules for accelerated write-offs and other benefits.
Multinational LNG operators want BC taxpayers to subsidize and assume commercial risks. It is a profitable strategy and one well practiced. Joseph Stiglitz, American Nobel Laureate, former chief economist for the World Bank and current Columbia economics professor says economic policies of governments are designed to transfer wealth from taxpayers to financial oligarchs. He said,
“There’s a system where we socialize losses and privatize gains. That’s not capitalism, that’s not a market economy, that’s a distorted economy and if we continue with that we won’t succeed in growing, and we won’t succeed in creating a just society.”
Without taxpayers taking on financial and environmental risks, BC's LNG industry will be nothing more than a modest demonstration project created to further BC Liberal election prospects in 2017. The world's business press reports:
International Business Times: "Russia plans to build a gas pipeline and accompanying railroad from its offshore Sakhalin Island fields, north of Japan, through North Korea to South Korea." Korea, India And Japan, Not Just China, Are Looking To Russia For Energy

Washington Post: "Russia now aims to pipe 38 billion cubic meters worth of gas to China annually. 'This is the biggest contract in the history of the gas sector of the former USSR,' trumpeted Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was on a visit to China this week." What the epic China-Russia natural gas deal looks like

Wall Street Daily: [Sinopec] "is putting its first commercial shale gas field into production much sooner than expected... That should mean China will hit its target of 6.5 bcm of shale gas production by 2015. This is a target that western energy analysts had said was unrealistic, but now it’s within sight...", China’s Long March to Shale Gas Development

Financial Times: "Chinese oil company Sinopec will put its first shale gasfield into commercial operation sooner than expected, aiming for annual production of 10bn cubic meters by 2017 as the country seeks to reduce its reliance on imported oil and gas...." Sinopec speeds up shale gas development

Reuters: "China may boast the world's largest potential reserves of shale gas but is likely to lose to Australia in the race to be second behind the United States in bringing significant production on line..." Australia, not China, the next great shale gas hope


Recommend this post

8 comments:

  1. LIberals have had no money to archive provincial documents for the last 10 years (I do not wonder why) and they have no money to improve public education. But, they have tens of billions of dollars to provide cheap power to industrial activities that employ relatively few people. There is one particular reason that public officials do things that make no financial sense. That reason may involve secret and foreign bank accounts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On the road to Argentina.BC debt now 63 billion 66 billion in 18 months and 2017- 69 billion

    http://thetyee.ca/News/2008/04/25/RiskyGovBiz/

    http://lailayuile.com/2013/01/03/a-must-read-are-tax-havens-robbing-the-government-of-p3-revenue/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why not use BC natural gas as a transport fuel in BC? Trucks, buses, cars, trains, ferries can be converted fairly easily.
    Make a cheaper, cleaner fuel available to people and business and they will buy it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BC Natural Gas = Fracking .
      Fracking can cause household water from the tap to burn.
      We can use the water from our taps to power our vehicles !
      Energy independence achieved !
      Christy Clark is a genius .
      I think it was Marie Antoinette who said " Let them drink Dasani".

      Delete
  4. Not only is there no financial benefit to LNG, but foreigners will get the jobs! WTF?

    "B.C. and China have inked a new agreement that will see the two governments work to allow foreign workers into the province if needed to help build a liquefied natural gas industry."

    http://www.vancouversun.com/China+agree+allow+foreign+workers+help+build+industry/10063770/story.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. ah and Hugh don't forget those welding schools in the Philippines where they are training welders for Canada, to be brought over under Jason Kenny's new "skilled workers" program. It will take only 10 days for them to be brought in, once requested. Then there will be Jason Kenny's program to permit corporations to bring their own employees if they have their "own" skill set.

    Christy and her crew announced a million and change for welding schools in B.C. The Philippines has most likely spent more. The corporations will want to use foreign workers because they won't unionize.

    If LNG and oil was really going to happen, you would think there would be welding courses in every high school in this province, so every kid who graduated had a welding certificate, if they wanted one. Oh, right, no school. works even better for Christy and her crew.

    We don't need welders. There aren't any jobs. They sent the contracts for 3 ferries to Poland and the federal government still hasn't given the go ahead to build the military ships.

    This province is over 60 billion in debt and going down faster every minute. When Christy and crew leave, we will be Detroit North.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 100 million payoff to pulp mills under the guise of a powersmart program - complete thievery.

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://www.ancientforestalliance.org/photos.php?gID=2

    ReplyDelete

COMMENTING

This is an archive only of items published before April 22, 2016. These and newer articles are available at:

https://in-sights.ca/

If you read an article at this blogger site, you can comment on it at the new site.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.