Friday, March 16, 2012

Deep down, she is shockingly shallow

Game Change, an HBO movie about the 2008 McCain / Palin campaign is more about éminence grise Steve Schmidt than the Senator or his running mate. A central element is the wretched selection of Sarah Palin as candidate for an office that is a heartbeat away from the presidency. McCain and his advisers chose Palin with too little critical review, taken, as they were, by possible star power and the hope she would be their game changer, the key to exercising power in the future.

A leadership choice made in British Columbia a year ago had parallels to Palin's elevation. Last week, Huffington Post published Game Change: Sarah Palin and the Confessions of Steve Schmidt, written by Geoffrey Dunn. One of Schmidt's comments was particularly notable. It asked how political parties can,
"select its leaders when celebrity packs more electoral cachet than experience or political courage."
Backstage managers of the BC LIberal Party also made a choice with too little critical review, taken, as they were, by star power and the hope Ms. Photo Op would be their game changer, the key to continued exercise of power. Capability and qualification mattered little to the people skulking off stage. They merely assumed the candidate would care for the voters, they would care for the business of government.

One difference though is Geoffrey Dunn's conclusion that naïve conservative idealism fostered Steve Schmidt's involvement in the McCain / Palin ticket. No British Columbia pundit will every accuse Patrick Kinsella or Gwyn Morgan of being naive or idealistic.
Recommend this post

2 comments:

  1. Another good post Norm.

    I think this link below fits in very nicely with your article - BC's Sarah Palin !

    http://lailayuile.com/2012/03/15/time-for-one-from-the-christy-clark-archives/#comments

    Also known as BC's "Gong Show " eh !!!

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. In my view there are at least two precedents for selecting political leaders "when celebrity packs more electoral cachet than experience or political courage". The first was Ronald Reagan and the second was Arnold Schwarzenegger. Who in their right mind would elect someone to high office who hadn't a stitch of experience to match the position?! (But Californians share the same coast as British Columbians - maybe there's something in the air or water?) Reagan in particular leaves a disastrous legacy that today's Republicans for some strange reason (ideology perhaps?) still revere.

    ReplyDelete

COMMENTING

This is an archive only of items published before April 22, 2016. These and newer articles are available at:

https://in-sights.ca/

If you read an article at this blogger site, you can comment on it at the new site.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.