Saturday, September 10, 2011

Jet set poseur or selfless campaigner ?

Recently, I've posed the question:
Is there an inevitable journey for professional environmentalists from impecunious youthful idealists to zealous hustlers loyally serving industrial interests for personal gain?
I made the inquiry in reader comments following a piece in the Vancouver Observer, Tzeporah Berman: coming home to Vancouver. The comment thread includes contributions from Damien Gillis, a filmmaker and undisputed environmentalist who remains focused on "issues of environmental and social justice issues - especially relating to water, energy, and saving Canada's wild salmon."

Gillis and others posed hard questions to the now Amsterdam based Greenpeace executive. These were about Berman's promotion of the independent power industry - she was a founder of greenwasher Power Up Canda - and her credulous pre-election support of Gordon Campbell and the BC Liberals.

Additionally, May Mickelow offered her conclusion to a sharp critique,
"...you promote things that are proven to have been and continue to be detrimental to BC and BCers, so stay gone!"
Tzezorah Berman has her supporters too. Last week, the Vancouver Sun published an uncritical piece that called her a fearless eco-activist. That was a surprising contribution from a newspaper that consistently reflects Fraser Institute opinions, including the claim that global warming science is untrustworthy and that management and exploitation of forests and power generation should be in private hands, unsullied by regulatory controls. Apparently, the editorial board judges that views of erstwhile eco-activists pose no threat to the newspaper's philosophical goals.

Berman had advocates in the VO comment thread. One was Nigel Protter, a consultant with direct involvement in the private power industry and a rather destructive proposal involving the Ryan River, near Pemberton. Another was Ian Ferguson who resorted immediately to argumentum ad hominem:
"Ahem, Uh, you guys do realize that most of you sound irrational and narcissistically self-absorbed? Oh, wait, probably not, eh?"
He followed that with,
"Sigh. Certitude without knowledge is a dangerous thing."
My response was,
"Don't worry Ian. You can set aside selfish purposes, open your mind to reality, study carefully and learn. Good luck, when you gain a degree of knowledge, you might even acquire a modicum of common sense and wisdom."
And his response:
"Hey, thanks Norman... for proving both my points. Now, go look up the word "sanctimonious."
Ferguson added not a single insight to the subjects under debate. He attempts to undermine opposing arguments by attacking persons instead of addressing arguments, a not unusual tactic of those with nothing to say. Like others who fear plebeian usurpers of the public stage, Ferguson ought to marshal his facts and hone his debating skills.

Public discourse may have been hijacked by professional propagandists promoting special interests, displacing the collective voice of ordinary citizens, but new media provides unprecedented freedom in the theatre of ideas. As Jody Paterson wrote at A Closer Look:
"...there’s no hiding the growing prowess of B.C.’s political bloggers, who never sleep. Word spread fast."
Ferguson may not understand the motives of people who speak without remuneration or financial interests. He might consider words of John Edgar Wideman:
"A speech to be performed because no one's listening. Like singing in the shower: no one hears you, but don't people sing their hearts out anyway, because the singing, the act itself, is also a listening to itself, so why not do your best to please yourself."

Recommend this post

5 comments:

  1. Norm, I think Jody Paterson was referring to you in particular. Your blog is the one source I turn to for daily news. I am amazed at the scope and reach of your subjects, and the research you do behind your posts. Great job.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tzeporah Berman, is one of the most odious self promoters around. She is no environmentalist, rather she is a corporate entity and sells herself to anyone who wishes to spend some' spreading around money' on her.

    I think Greenpeace, another self serving lot who have lost their environmentalist roots, just doesn't know what damage it has done to themselves, when they hired Berman.

    I think we can call her an environmental whore.

    Berman, Lord Ha, Ha, Quisling, all cut from the same cloth!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jet set poseur. She should stay gone....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Greenpeace now a multinational business sitting with 149€ ($200 million CAN) cash in the bank at the end of 2010 and revenues for the year up by 15%.

    ReplyDelete
  5. World renowned scientists, have all testified, and are willing to lay in front of, the dirty pipelines to the U.S. and BC. Even Robert Redford gave Obama a blast, regarding the dirty oil pipeline. How many more pipeline bursts will it take????How much more water and soil will be contaminated????How many more oil spills in the oceans???Before common sense will trump greed???

    There is acid in the ocean, right up to the shores of BC. Scientists were astounded. They thought the acid, way out in the deeps. The acid will eventually eat the shells off the crustaceans. The coral is bleaching white. Scientists say, The Great Barrier Reef, will be gone, within 20 years. Our oceans are dying. If the ocean dies, we die.

    ReplyDelete

COMMENTING

This is an archive only of items published before April 22, 2016. These and newer articles are available at:

https://in-sights.ca/

If you read an article at this blogger site, you can comment on it at the new site.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.